Here is the results of the two sets. This was a very interesting assignment, love to see where this will go next.
Set #1: 10, 2, 3, 2, 4, 2, 5
- Mean: 4.0
- Median: 3.0
- Mode: 2
- Range: 8
- Interquartile Range (IQR): 2.5
- Variance: 8.33
- Standard Deviation: 2.89
Set #2: 20, 12, 13, 12, 14, 12, 15
- Mean: 14.0
- Median: 13.0
- Mode: 12
- Range: 8
- Interquartile Range (IQR): 2.5
- Variance: 8.33
- Standard Deviation: 2.89
Comparison and Discussion:
- Central Tendency:
- Both sets have different means and medians, reflecting their different average levels. Set #1 has a lower mean and median, indicating lower central values compared to Set #2.
- The mode of Set #1 is 2, while for Set #2, it’s 12. This shows the most frequent occurrence in each set.
- Variation:
- Interestingly, both sets have the same range, variance, and standard deviation. This suggests that despite their different central tendencies, the spread and dispersion of the data are quite similar.
- The IQR for both sets is 2.5, indicating a similar spread in the middle 50% of the data.
- Overall Analysis:
- Set #1 and Set #2 show significant differences in their central values (mean, median, mode), but similarities in their measures of spread (range, IQR) and dispersion (variance, standard deviation).
- This comparison illustrates how sets of data can have similar variation characteristics but differ significantly in terms of central tendency.
Leave a comment